Curated Skills Lift Success Rates 16.2 Points — Self-Generated Ones Cost You 1.3
Notes on SoK: Agentic Skills - Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents (arXiv:2602.20867) — Yanna Jiang, Delong Li, Hai Deng, Baihe Ma, Xu Wang, Qin Wang, Guangsheng Yu · February 2026
Note published · written by SkillFed’s research pipeline from the paper above · how these notes are made
AI-assisted notes · reviewed by SkillFed Skill security Bridge: security × benchmarksAn agentic skill, formalized here as a four-part contract S = (C, π, T, R), needs all four pieces to count: an applicability condition that decides when it fires, an executable policy, a termination condition, and a callable interface. That's what separates a skill from a raw tool call (no reuse contract), a one-off plan (no persistence), or stored memory (no execution policy) — three things builders already reach for and easily mistake for skills. The definition anchors a lifecycle — discovery, practice, distillation, storage, composition, evaluation, update — plus two taxonomies for what's already shipping. Seven system-level design patterns cover how skills get packaged and run, from metadata-first progressive disclosure and executable code skills through workflow-enforcing gates, self-evolving skill libraries, hybrid natural-language-plus-code macros, meta-skills, and marketplace-distributed plugins. A second, orthogonal grid crosses representation (natural language, code, policy, hybrid) against operating scope (web, OS, software engineering, robotics).
The security case study is concrete. OpenClaw's community registry, ClawHub, grew from zero to over 10,700 published skills within weeks, while the underlying project passed 200,000 GitHub stars faster than any software repository in history. Into that marketplace, the ClawHavoc campaign slipped nearly 1,200 malicious skills before anyone caught them — exfiltrating API keys, crypto wallets, and browser credentials, because OpenClaw skills run with the agent's full system permissions. The evaluation evidence comes from a separate benchmark, SkillsBench: 86 tasks across 11 domains, 7,308 trajectories, three conditions — no skills, curated skills, self-generated skills. Curated skills lifted the average pass rate 16.2 percentage points, from 24.3% to 40.6%; skills an agent generated for itself made things 1.3 points worse. The spread by domain was wide: healthcare gained 51.9 points and manufacturing 41.9, while software engineering managed only 4.5 and mathematics 6.0. A smaller model running curated skills beat a larger model running none.
Key numbers
| Curated-skill success-rate lift | +16.2 pp avg (24.3% → 40.6%) |
| Self-generated skill effect | -1.3 pp vs. no-skill baseline |
| Malicious skills in ClawHavoc breach | ~1,200 skills |
| ClawHub registry growth | 0 → 10,700+ skills in weeks |
| Domain variance (curated-skill gain) | +51.9 pp (healthcare) vs. +4.5 pp (software eng.) |
Skills related to this research
Related notes
- SkillFortify doesn't just scan skills, it proves the scan -- 96.95% F1, 0% false positives →
- A trojanized skill hit 9x token amplification — the failed run cost more than either successful one →
- 1,858 reusable skills mined from 22,511 real chats — zero weight updates →
- Flat Skill Invocation Craters From 48 to 17 as the Pool Hits 200,000 →
- Skill folders, not weights: +12.1 points on noisy-retrieval QA →
- 200k+ skills wired into one graph, +40% reward across three backbones →
References
- Jiang et al., "SoK: Agentic Skills - Beyond Tool Use in LLM Agents" (arXiv:2602.20867, 2026)