--- id: yonatangross/orchestkit/testing-llm version: "cdb92895" license: MIT install: manual updated: 2026-07-28 --- # testing-llm — testing-llm equips you with patterns for mocking LLM API calls, evaluating output quality across multiple dimensions, and automating test workflows through planner, generator, and healer agents. Use it to build deterministic CI tests, validate RAG pipelines, and apply structured output validation with Pydantic schemas. Publisher: yonatangross · Stars: 208 · Updated: 2026-07-28 Install (manual): `git clone https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit` ## SKILL.md # LLM & AI Testing Patterns Patterns and tools for testing LLM integrations, evaluating AI output quality, mocking responses for deterministic CI, and applying agentic test workflows (planner, generator, healer). ## Quick Reference | Area | File | Purpose | |------|------|---------| | **Rules** | `rules/llm-evaluation.md` | DeepEval quality metrics, Pydantic schema validation, timeout testing | | **Rules** | `rules/llm-mocking.md` | Mock LLM responses, VCR.py recording, custom request matchers | | **Reference** | `references/deepeval-ragas-api.md` | Full API reference for DeepEval and RAGAS metrics | | **Reference** | `references/generator-agent.md` | Transforms Markdown specs into Playwright tests | | **Reference** | `references/healer-agent.md` | Auto-fixes failing tests (selectors, waits, dynamic content) | | **Reference** | `references/planner-agent.md` | Explores app and produces Markdown test plans | | **Checklist** | `checklists/llm-test-checklist.md` | Complete LLM testing checklist (setup, coverage, CI/CD) | | **Example** | `examples/llm-test-patterns.md` | Full examples: mocking, structured output, DeepEval, VCR, golden datasets | ## When to Use This Skill - Testing code that calls LLM APIs (OpenAI, Anthropic, etc.) - Validating RAG pipeline output quality - Setting up deterministic LLM tests in CI - Building evaluation pipelines with quality gates - Applying agentic test patterns (plan -> generate -> heal) ## LLM Mock Quick Start Mock LLM responses for fast, deterministic unit tests: ```python from unittest.mock import AsyncMock, patch import pytest @pytest.fixture def mock_llm(): mock = AsyncMock() mock.return_value = {"content": "Mocked response", "confidence": 0.85} return mock @pytest.mark.asyncio async def test_with_mocked_llm(mock_llm): with patch("app.core.model_factory.get_model", return_value=mock_llm): result = await synthesize_findings(sample_findings) assert result["summary"] is not None ``` **Key rule:** NEVER call live LLM APIs in CI. Use mocks for unit tests, VCR.py for integration tests. ## DeepEval Quality Quick Start Validate LLM output quality with multi-dimensional metrics: ```python from deepeval import assert_test from deepeval.test_case import LLMTestCase from deepeval.metrics import AnswerRelevancyMetric, FaithfulnessMetric test_case = LLMTestCase( input="What is the capital of France?", actual_output="The capital of France is Paris.", retrieval_context=["Paris is the capital of France."], ) assert_test(test_case, [ AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7), FaithfulnessMetric(threshold=0.8), ]) ``` ## Library notes (DeepEval, RAGAS) **DeepEval** metrics expose a `reason` field alongside the numeric score when `include_reason=True`, so a failing CI build gets a human-readable explanation without a second LLM call: ```python metric = AnswerRelevancyMetric(threshold=0.7, include_reason=True) metric.measure(test_case) print(metric.score, metric.reason) # 0.62 "Response addresses the topic but omits the date asked for." ``` **RAGAS** uses a class-based metric API — instantiate metric classes and pass an `EvaluationDataset`. `llm=` is optional; omit it to use the configured default grader: ```python from ragas import evaluate from ragas.metrics import Faithfulness, LLMContextRecall result = evaluate( dataset, metrics=[Faithfulness(), LLMContextRecall()], ) ``` > Bump floors: `deepeval >= 4.0`, `ragas >= 0.4`. ## Quality Metrics Thresholds | Metric | Threshold | Purpose | |--------|-----------|---------| | Answer Relevancy | >= 0.7 | Response addresses question | | Faithfulness | >= 0.8 | Output matches context | | Hallucination | <= 0.3 | No fabricated facts | | Context Precision | >= 0.7 | Retrieved contexts relevant | | Context Recall | >= 0.7 | All relevant contexts retrieved | ## Structured Output Validation Always validate LLM output with Pydantic schemas: ```python from pydantic import BaseModel, Field class LLMResponse(BaseModel): answer: str = Field(min_length=1) confidence: float = Field(ge=0.0, le=1.0) sources: list[str] = Field(default_factory=list) async def test_structured_output(): result = await get_llm_response("test query") parsed = LLMResponse.model_validate(result) assert 0 <= parsed.confidence <= 1.0 ``` ## VCR.py for Integration Tests Record and replay LLM API calls for deterministic integration tests: ```python @pytest.fixture(scope="module") def vcr_config(): import os return { "record_mode": "none" if os.environ.get("CI") else "new_episodes", "filter_headers": ["authorization", "x-api-key"], } @pytest.mark.vcr() async def test_llm_integration(): response = await llm_client.complete("Say hello") assert "hello" in response.content.lower() ``` ## Agentic Test Workflow The three-agent pattern for end-to-end test automation: ``` Planner -> specs/*.md -> Generator -> tests/*.spec.ts -> Healer (auto-fix) ``` 1. **Planner** (`references/planner-agent.md`): Explores your app, produces Markdown test plans from PRDs or natural language requests. Requires `seed.spec.ts` for app context. 2. **Generator** (`references/generator-agent.md`): Converts Markdown specs into Playwright tests. Actively validates selectors against the running app. Uses semantic locators (getByRole, getByLabel, getByText). 3. **Healer** (`references/healer-agent.md`): Automatically fixes failing tests by replaying failures, inspecting the DOM, and patching locators/waits. Max 3 healing attempts per test. ## Edge Cases to Always Test For every LLM integration, cover these paths: - **Empty/null inputs** -- empty strings, None values - **Long inputs** -- truncation behavior near token limits - **Timeouts** -- fail-open vs fail-closed behavior - **Schema violations** -- invalid structured output - **Prompt injection** -- adversarial input resistance - **Unicode** -- non-ASCII characters in prompts and responses See `checklists/llm-test-checklist.md` for the complete checklist. ## Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Correct Approach | |-------------|-----------------| | Live LLM calls in CI | Mock for unit, VCR for integration | | Random seeds | Fixed seeds or mocked responses | | Single metric evaluation | 3-5 quality dimensions | | No timeout handling | Always set < 1s timeout in tests | | Hardcoded API keys | Environment variables, filtered in VCR | | Asserting only `is not None` | Schema validation + quality metrics | ## Related Skills - `ork:testing-unit` — Unit testing fundamentals, AAA pattern - `ork:testing-integration` — Integration testing for AI pipelines - `ork:golden-dataset` — Evaluation dataset management [View on SkillFed](https://skillfed.io/yonatangross/orchestkit/testing-llm) · [View on GitHub](https://github.com/yonatangross/orchestkit)