A self-writing skill library lifts Humanity's Last Exam accuracy 116% — with zero weight updates
Notes on Memento-Skills: Let Agents Design Agents (arXiv:2603.18743) — Huichi Zhou, Siyuan Guo, Anji Liu, Zhongwei Yu, Ziqin Gong, Bowen Zhao, Zhixun Chen, Menglong Zhang, Yihang Chen, Jinsong Li, Runyu Yang, Qiang Liu, and 5 more · March 2026
Note published · written by SkillFed’s research pipeline from the paper above · how these notes are made
AI-assisted notes · reviewed by SkillFed Skill evolutionMemento-Skills flips who designs the agent: instead of a human hand-building a task-specific system, a generalist LLM builds and refines its own sub-agents through experience — an agent-designing agent. Capability lives in reusable skills: structured markdown files that serve as external, persistent memory, encoding both the behavior and the context it applies to. The agent starts from a small seed — web search, terminal operations — and grows the library from there. Growth runs on Read-Write Reflective Learning, a two-phase loop from a companion system, Memento 2. A read phase lets a trained skill router pick the most relevant skill for the current stateful prompt; a write phase lets the agent update and expand its own library based on what just happened. None of it touches the base LLM's weights. Every bit of adaptation gets externalized into the skill files and prompts themselves.
On GAIA (General AI Assistants) and Humanity's Last Exam, that closed loop of skill creation, routing, and revision produces sustained accuracy gains as the library accumulates: 26.2% relative improvement in overall accuracy on GAIA, 116.2% on HLE. Both results trace back to the skill library evolving — not to any additional gradient update on the model.
Key numbers
| GAIA relative accuracy gain | +26.2% |
| HLE relative accuracy gain | +116.2% |
| HLE gain vs. GAIA gain | ≈4.4× larger |
Skills related to this research
Related notes
- A learned memory-skill bank beats fixed insert/update/delete baselines by 5-7 points, on 6x fewer LLM calls →
- MUSE-Autoskill's Self-Written Skills Beat Human-Authored Ones, 85.24% vs. 81.17% →
- Self-tested skill edits beat teacher-curated skill banks by up to 9.3 points →
- 215 Skills, 165 Contributors, No Fidelity Test →
- Skills Trained Into the Model Beat Runtime-Loaded Skills by Up to 10.1 Points →
- Four-Way Attribution Gates Every Update to a Million-Scale Skill Corpus →
- Self-generated web skills score below no skill at all — contract-based repair triples success to 28.1% →
- 90% of a Skill Marketplace's Most-Downloaded Skills Fail a Rigorous Security Audit →
- 20,000 listed skills, 5,642 distinct: clone detection finds the catalog is 3.5x inflated →
References
- Zhou, H., Guo, S., Liu, A. et al. "Memento-Skills: Let Agents Design Agents." arXiv:2603.18743 (2026).
- Wang et al. "Memento 2" (2025) — introduces the Read-Write Reflective Learning mechanism this work builds on.