{"enrichment":{"faq":[{"a":"discuss is a governance design tool that guides you through structured conversations about architecture and policy decisions. It helps you explore RFC and ADR without coding, identify constraints from your repository's existing context, compare design options, and produce durable artifacts that capture decisions and obligations\u2014all without moving into implementation.","q":"What is discuss and what governance tasks does it handle?"},{"a":"discuss supports drafting ADR and RFC documents by walking you through governance design exploration. It helps you analyze design trade-offs, establish decision rationale, and validate governance artifacts before lifecycle transitions. You can resolve design ambiguity governance by comparing options and documenting your reasoning without writing implementation code.","q":"How do I draft architecture decision records with discuss?"},{"a":"Yes. discuss is built to explore and discuss governance design options to resolve ambiguity at high priority. It grounds conversations in your repository's existing governance artifacts and constraints, then helps you analyze design trade-offs and establish clear decision rationale for each option you consider.","q":"Can discuss help me explore design options and resolve ambiguity?"},{"a":"discuss helps you draft RFC or ADR artifacts without implementing code. It supports governance artifact drafting, design rationale documentation, and governance design review processes. You can also validate governance artifacts before lifecycle transitions to ensure they meet your requirements.","q":"What kind of governance artifacts can discuss help me create?"},{"a":"discuss is purely a discussion and drafting tool\u2014it produces durable artifacts like RFCs and ADRs that capture decisions and obligations without moving into implementation. You explore governance design options, compare trade-offs, and document rationale entirely through conversation and artifact creation, with no coding required.","q":"Does discuss require me to write code or just discuss design?"}],"shadow_tags":["architecture-decisions","governance-artifacts","design-rationale","rfc-authoring","adr-documentation","design-exploration","decision-analysis","governance-framework","artifact-management","design-constraints"],"summary_rewrite":"discuss guides you through governance design conversations grounded in your repository's existing context. It helps identify constraints, compare design options, and produce durable artifacts like RFCs and ADRs that capture decisions and obligations without moving into implementation."},"files":[{"bytes":3677,"path":".claude/skills/discuss/SKILL.md","sha256":"b46d6b3af827925944294bbcfa8d987ffa8880eb687a360f558bfe33e6205602","url":"https://skillfed.io/files/govctl-org/govctl/discuss/150b5041/SKILL.md"}],"id":"govctl-org/govctl/discuss","links":{"html":"https://skillfed.io/govctl-org/govctl/discuss","md":"https://skillfed.io/govctl-org/govctl/discuss.md","repo":"https://github.com/govctl-org/govctl"},"meta":{"agents_supported":["claude-code"],"first_seen":"2026-07-28","forks":12,"language":"Rust","last_updated":"2026-07-27","license":"MIT","name":"discuss","publisher":"govctl-org","stars":239},"relations":{"categories":["governance","architecture-decision-making","documentation"],"similar":[{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/spec"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/rfc-writer"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/gov"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/migrate"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/decision-analysis"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/detach"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/init"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/adr-writer"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/commit"},{"id":"govctl-org/govctl/guard-writer"}]},"slug":{"owner":"govctl-org","repo":"govctl","skill":"discuss"},"version":"150b5041"}